Search results for "tieteellinen julkaiseminen"
showing 9 items of 9 documents
Transparency of peer review: a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities
2021
Background Open peer review practices are increasing in medicine and life sciences, but in social sciences and humanities (SSH) they are still rare. We aimed to map out how editors of respected SSH journals perceive open peer review, how they balance policy, ethics, and pragmatism in the review processes they oversee, and how they view their own power in the process. Methods We conducted 12 pre-registered semi-structured interviews with editors of respected SSH journals. Interviews consisted of 21 questions and lasted an average of 67 min. Interviews were transcribed, descriptively coded, and organized into code families. Results SSH editors saw anonymized peer review benefits to outweigh t…
Kaksi vuosikymmentä vertaisarvioituja tutkimusartikkeleita
2019
Naisten asiantuntemuksen saaminen näkyviin vaatii konkreettisia tekoja
2022
Pääkirjoitus 4/2023
Rinnakkaistallentamisen kriittiset menestystekijät
2017
Esitelmä Kansalliskirjaston järjestämässä Rinnakkaistallentaminen Suomessa -seminaarissa 25.1.2017
Näkökulmia tiedetoimittamiseen
2019
Alma materin isoveli valvoo
2022
Developing doctoral students' / researchers’ understanding of the journal peer-review process
2021
A growing body of knowledge has confirmed that the journal peer-review process is an integral part of the scientific publication process and provides demonstrable benefits to journal editors and authors. This study aims to develop doctoral students’ understanding of the journal peer-review process and highlight the most common errors and pitfalls reviewers identify in novice authors’ manuscripts, which could lead to rejection. A qualitative content analysis research method was used to analyse the primary data as experience collected from senior researchers, editors and associate editors. Among the major contributions of this study is an interactive diagram that provides an overview of the j…
Kuinka referee kesytetään? : vertaisarviointiprosessi ja palautteeseen vastaaminen
2022
Opening the black box of editors’ work
2022
publishedVersion Non peer reviewed